He explained that at the time he wasn’t favoring Cavill but marveled at the way James Bond is cast. He’s in good shape Henry, he’s a good guy.” “Henry’s 40, so by the time he’s done the third one he’s going to be 50 and anything beyond that’s two, three years per Bond. “By the time Daniel got to really he was at an age where one more would have been too old for him,” he said. The Hollywood Reporter reached out to representatives for Campbell. Though Cavill may have looked a little too young at the time, the actor is now 40, and the director thinks he could potentially still play the part of Bond. James Bond Producer Says They "Haven't Even Begun" Working on Post-Daniel Craig Era: "Big Road Ahead" He just looked a little young at that time back then.” He looked terrific, he was in great physical shape … very handsome, very chiseled. And look, if Daniel didn’t exist Henry would have made an excellent Bond. “He looked great in the audition,” Campbell told the publication. The role came down to a few actors, notably Cavill, who was in his early 20s at the time. In a recent interview with Express UK, GoldenEye and Casino Royale director Martin Campbell opened up about the audition process for the 2006 James Bond movie that introduced Craig’s 007. The coveted role of James Bond likely would’ve gone to Henry Cavill in the early 2000s if Daniel Craig hadn’t auditioned for it, too.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |